Sacred Site Gets Respite
PALA, Calif. – A site in rural San Diego County deemed culturally and environmentally sensitive by Indians was given a respite Aug. 5 from being turned into a landfill.
The Pala Band of Mission Indians, whose community sits two miles away from the site, and an environmental group, objected to the application to operate the proposed 1,770-acre landfill filed from Gregory Canyon Landfill Ltd of San Diego, the tribe said in a press release.
A San Diego County public agency rescinded its previous green light on the application after the tribe and the Natural Resources Defense Council pointed out the lack of financial responsibility and other inaccuracies in the application, the tribe said in the press release.
“We want to make sure that this time the county is really looking at a comprehensive application package that accurately reflects the environmental, financial and cultural impacts that this landfill will have,” said Robert Smith, chairman of the Pala Band of Mission Indians. “The county has a duty to make sure new landfills do not destroy important cultural or environmental resources or threaten public health, and it can’t do that unless it has accurate information.”
Gregory Landfill spokesperson Nancy Chase said the application was not rejected by San Diego County officials but voluntarily withdrawn from county consideration because it needed to be updated.
“It had nothing to do with financial responsibility.”
County records indicate that its positive determination on the application was rescinded and Gregory Landfill withdrew the application on the same day.
The landfill has been a subject of dispute since at least the 1990s and the subject of court actions, including an order by a superior court to make corrections on a mandated environmental impact report and conform to the law in 2006, according to county records.
Gregory Canyon has until Feb. 1, 2011 to resubmit the application, according to the county. The applicant expects to resubmit their application later this month Chase said.
The proposed landfill is located in an area that Pala people consider sacred and home of a restless spirit named Taakwic, who appears in a ball of fire to collect the souls of the dead. The landfill threatens surface and groundwater supplies, which includes a habitat for several sensitive and endangered species and would create traffic congestion and other problems in the serene area if constructed, according to the tribe.
Gregory Landfill maintains that the project’s technology includes redundant liners and monitoring points and pose no threat to water sources.
Indian Country Today-August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
UN DELARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLE EXPANDS INTO THE FINANCIAL WORLD
BETHESDA, Md. – The movement to persuade the federal government to endorse the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples without qualification has grown beyond American Indian and religious communities to the financial world.
Calvert Investments, a financial services company that holds $14.5 billion in assets, and a coalition of investors have submitted comments to the State Department and White House urging the unconditional endorsement of the Declaration.
“Calvert believes indigenous peoples in the U.S. and elsewhere around the globe deserve the affirmation and recognition of the broad array of rights set forth in the Declaration, including those related to self-determination, culture, land and natural resources, means of subsistence, treaty rights, non-discrimination, health and social services, protection of sacred sites, education and language,” Calvert CEO and president Barbara J. Krumsiek wrote in a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton July 14.
“All these are rights which indigenous peoples themselves have identified as necessary to their survival, well-being and dignity – rights which the international community should fully embrace,” Krumsiek wrote.
The U.N. General Assembly voted to adopt UNDRIP in September 2007 with near unanimous approval. Four states – the U.S., Canada, Australia and New Zealand – voted against the Declaration. Australia and New Zealand have since endorsed the human rights document and Canada has indicated its intention to do so.
The National Congress of American Indians and the United South and Eastern Tribes, the country’s two largest non-governmental organizations representing Indian nations, have passed resolutions urging the government to endorse the Declaration.
Last summer, the Episcopal Church passed a resolution supporting the endorsement of UNDRIP that was quickly followed by similar resolutions by the Indian Committee of Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends and the Unitarian Universalist Church of Tarpon Springs.
Growing support for the U.S. to reverse its rejection of the Declaration led up to the announcement in April by U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice that the U.S. would review its position on the Declaration. The review is now underway with scheduled consultation meetings and a State Department Web site where people may e-mail comments.
Calvert, a socially responsible investment firm, not only asked the federal government to publicly endorse the Declaration but also to disclose its plan for fully implementing the human rights statement.
In 1999, Calvert was the first SRI to develop explicit criteria to address the rights and cultural integrity of American Indians and indigenous peoples around the world.
“We believe that it’s important to share an investor perspective and add another dimension about why it’s important to endorse the Declaration,” said Reed Montague, the indigenous peoples’ rights and product marketing analyst at Calvert.
Montague and Calvert’s team of sustainability analysts review corporations that the firm invests in to see if they have policies and procedures in place that consider and support indigenous people’s rights and to encourage firms to develop appropriate policies and demonstrate best practices regarding how their products, services and operations affect the lives, culture and traditions of indigenous peoples.
This is particularly important for companies operating on indigenous lands, Montague said.
“One of the angles we thought was important to share, as an investing company, is that if the U.S. adopts the UNDRIP we think that is going to help our engagement with these companies in order for them to understand how and why it’s so important,” Montague said.
The U.S. rejection of the Declaration has had the opposite effect, according to Steven Heim, managing director of Boston Commons Assets Management, a socially responsible investment company, and chairman of the advocacy committee of the Indigenous Peoples Working Group of the Social Investment Forum, a national nonprofit membership association for professionals, firms, institutions and organizations engaged in socially responsible and sustainable investing.
“Boston Commons has heard some companies say that not having the U.S. endorse the Declaration has made it difficult for them on a policy basis to include the (principles of the) Declaration in their own corporate human rights policies,” Heim said.
Boston Commons is among the coalition of SRI investors and organizations – including Calvert – that has submitted comments to the State Department, the White House, the National Security Council, and other federal agencies to urge the endorsement of the Declaration “in a positive manner without qualifications, consistent with international human rights.”
The groups include: the Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin’s Oneida Trust; the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation’s Mashantucket Pequot (Western) Endowment Trust; The Morning Star Institute; Mercy Investment Services Corp.; The Christopher Reynolds Foundation; Walden Asset Management; and First Affirmative Financial Network.
Heim said he wrote the coalition’s letter with input from Gary Brouse, the program director at the Interfaith Center for Corporate Responsibility, and Armstrong Wiggins, director of the Washington office of the Indian Law Resource Center.
The Declaration “represents a historic milestone in the evolution of the rights of indigenous peoples. We fully expect these rights to be increasingly articulated and adopted both in national and international law. Many of the rights in the Declaration are already being implemented in a number of U.S. federal laws, policies and executive orders,” the coalition wrote.
The Social Funds Web site recently cited a report from EIRIS, a United Kingdom-based investment research firm, which documents the material risks to companies that disregard the rights of indigenous peoples. It quotes John Ruggie, the special representative of the U.N. secretary general on business and human rights, saying that “community challenges on environmental and human rights grounds. … can cause delays in permits, reduced output, reputational hits and project cancellations.”
The investors’ coalition said U.S. endorsement of the Declaration is important to provide “federal policy certainty” for corporations operating on indigenous lands globally.
“As investors, we believe that environmental, social and governance issues have a significant impact on long-term financial returns. We expect that companies that respect indigenous peoples rights and build good relations with indigenous nations will prosper in the long run,” they said.
Indian Country Today-August 10, 2010
Calvert Investments, a financial services company that holds $14.5 billion in assets, and a coalition of investors have submitted comments to the State Department and White House urging the unconditional endorsement of the Declaration.
“Calvert believes indigenous peoples in the U.S. and elsewhere around the globe deserve the affirmation and recognition of the broad array of rights set forth in the Declaration, including those related to self-determination, culture, land and natural resources, means of subsistence, treaty rights, non-discrimination, health and social services, protection of sacred sites, education and language,” Calvert CEO and president Barbara J. Krumsiek wrote in a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton July 14.
“All these are rights which indigenous peoples themselves have identified as necessary to their survival, well-being and dignity – rights which the international community should fully embrace,” Krumsiek wrote.
The U.N. General Assembly voted to adopt UNDRIP in September 2007 with near unanimous approval. Four states – the U.S., Canada, Australia and New Zealand – voted against the Declaration. Australia and New Zealand have since endorsed the human rights document and Canada has indicated its intention to do so.
The National Congress of American Indians and the United South and Eastern Tribes, the country’s two largest non-governmental organizations representing Indian nations, have passed resolutions urging the government to endorse the Declaration.
Last summer, the Episcopal Church passed a resolution supporting the endorsement of UNDRIP that was quickly followed by similar resolutions by the Indian Committee of Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends and the Unitarian Universalist Church of Tarpon Springs.
Growing support for the U.S. to reverse its rejection of the Declaration led up to the announcement in April by U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice that the U.S. would review its position on the Declaration. The review is now underway with scheduled consultation meetings and a State Department Web site where people may e-mail comments.
Calvert, a socially responsible investment firm, not only asked the federal government to publicly endorse the Declaration but also to disclose its plan for fully implementing the human rights statement.
In 1999, Calvert was the first SRI to develop explicit criteria to address the rights and cultural integrity of American Indians and indigenous peoples around the world.
“We believe that it’s important to share an investor perspective and add another dimension about why it’s important to endorse the Declaration,” said Reed Montague, the indigenous peoples’ rights and product marketing analyst at Calvert.
Montague and Calvert’s team of sustainability analysts review corporations that the firm invests in to see if they have policies and procedures in place that consider and support indigenous people’s rights and to encourage firms to develop appropriate policies and demonstrate best practices regarding how their products, services and operations affect the lives, culture and traditions of indigenous peoples.
This is particularly important for companies operating on indigenous lands, Montague said.
“One of the angles we thought was important to share, as an investing company, is that if the U.S. adopts the UNDRIP we think that is going to help our engagement with these companies in order for them to understand how and why it’s so important,” Montague said.
The U.S. rejection of the Declaration has had the opposite effect, according to Steven Heim, managing director of Boston Commons Assets Management, a socially responsible investment company, and chairman of the advocacy committee of the Indigenous Peoples Working Group of the Social Investment Forum, a national nonprofit membership association for professionals, firms, institutions and organizations engaged in socially responsible and sustainable investing.
“Boston Commons has heard some companies say that not having the U.S. endorse the Declaration has made it difficult for them on a policy basis to include the (principles of the) Declaration in their own corporate human rights policies,” Heim said.
Boston Commons is among the coalition of SRI investors and organizations – including Calvert – that has submitted comments to the State Department, the White House, the National Security Council, and other federal agencies to urge the endorsement of the Declaration “in a positive manner without qualifications, consistent with international human rights.”
The groups include: the Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin’s Oneida Trust; the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation’s Mashantucket Pequot (Western) Endowment Trust; The Morning Star Institute; Mercy Investment Services Corp.; The Christopher Reynolds Foundation; Walden Asset Management; and First Affirmative Financial Network.
Heim said he wrote the coalition’s letter with input from Gary Brouse, the program director at the Interfaith Center for Corporate Responsibility, and Armstrong Wiggins, director of the Washington office of the Indian Law Resource Center.
The Declaration “represents a historic milestone in the evolution of the rights of indigenous peoples. We fully expect these rights to be increasingly articulated and adopted both in national and international law. Many of the rights in the Declaration are already being implemented in a number of U.S. federal laws, policies and executive orders,” the coalition wrote.
The Social Funds Web site recently cited a report from EIRIS, a United Kingdom-based investment research firm, which documents the material risks to companies that disregard the rights of indigenous peoples. It quotes John Ruggie, the special representative of the U.N. secretary general on business and human rights, saying that “community challenges on environmental and human rights grounds. … can cause delays in permits, reduced output, reputational hits and project cancellations.”
The investors’ coalition said U.S. endorsement of the Declaration is important to provide “federal policy certainty” for corporations operating on indigenous lands globally.
“As investors, we believe that environmental, social and governance issues have a significant impact on long-term financial returns. We expect that companies that respect indigenous peoples rights and build good relations with indigenous nations will prosper in the long run,” they said.
Indian Country Today-August 10, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
