Tuesday, December 14, 2010

SHELLMOUND PEACE WALK HONORS NATIVES AMERICANS ANCESTORS




Shellmound Peace Walk Honors Native American Ancestors

The Bay Area was once ringed by shellmounds, monuments and burial grounds for the Native Americans who lived here.


On Saturday morning at 9:30 a.m., a small circle of people, bundled in scarves, hats and rain gear, stood in the wide median of Encinal Avenue near High Street on Alameda's East End.

"There was a village here until 1847," said Zoe Holder of Alameda's Multicultural Center, one of 30-plus walkers participating in Day Four of the 10-Day Shellmound Peace Walk. The walk passed through Alameda Friday and Saturday.

The Ohlone village was "the last in Alameda and one of the last in the East Bay," said Holder.

Amidst the cars whizzing by, a break in the heavy rain and the playful shouts of children at the bus stop across High Street, the group stood silent, allowing their imaginations to venture back in time to a wholly different landscape, one in which the site was home to members of the Ohlone people.

In 1847, what is now the island of Alameda was a peninsula. Just north of the village site was a huge shellmound, a massive mound of shells, artifacts, as well as human remains — one of hundreds created by native people and marked on early European maps of the region. To the east, the salty waters of the San Francisco Bay would have been at the village's eastern edge. Landfill has since moved the shore many blocks away.

"Just to think they managed to stay here that late," said Holder, observing that most Native Americans were forced out of their Oakland homes by 1809.

The Peace Walk, which this year takes a route from San Jose to Benicia before looping back at the Huchiun Shellmound (now the site of the Bay Street Mall in Emeryville), was first held in 2005. This year the walk is sponsored by Indian People Organizing for Change, Shellmound Peace Walkers, SSP&RIT, a Native American advocacy group, and Foot Prints for Peace.

This fifth Peacewalk is being held in celebration of modifications to the federal Native American Graves Protection and Reparations Act, originally passed in 1990. The act is designed to make it easier for Native Americans like the Ohlone, whose tribes have neither federal recognition nor land, to gain possession of their ancestors' remains when they are unearthed or located in museums or collections.

Made up of shells, including clam, mussel and oyster shells, shellmounds were so huge they appear as landmarks on the original Coast Guard maps of the area. Some of them have been carbon-dated at more than 5,000 years old

"We stop at the different shellmounds that have been desecrated and built over and we pray," said Corrina Gould, a Chochenyo Ohlone and one of walk's organizers. "Our prayers for those four years [of the walk] were to have the ancestors returned. Now the prayer is to find places for them."

Some walkers slept Saturday night at Alameda's First Congregational Church, United Church of Christ. Others joined the group for the day, meeting at the corner of Washington and Mound streets for a prayer circle. Then they continued down Washington Street a few blocks, pausing to honor the site where the remains of a 3-year-old Native American girl were unearthed by a construction crew a couple years ago.

Then on they walked down High Street, orange-vested guides marking the front and rear of the group. They reached the site where the Ohlone village once stood, then walked on to Lincoln Park, where they stopped at the plaque that memorializes the site of the huge shellmound, know as the Sather Mound.

It was disassembled in 1908 and the bulk of the material there, including human remains, were carted away and used for roads.

"Shell mounds are cemeteries," said Gould. "And every time there's a building there you know that someone's cemetery was taken out for a shopping center or a Starbucks."

Gould said that shellmounds were common in the Bay Area but not unique to it. "In other places in the world," said Gould, "people have found ways to build around them. But not here."

Then the group walked on, up Lincoln Avenue, some drumming, others chatting. They left Alameda by way of the Park Street Bridge to walk along the Embarcadero, an area once known as "Shellmound Tract."

Saturday's walk finished for the night at a shellmound in Berkeley at Fourth and University, after a day-long 12-mile urban trek.

"When you're walking you don't pay attention to the cold and rain," said Wounded Knee De O'Campo, a member of the Me-Wok tribe, who said he was walking as a call for people of the world to stop the "desecration of scared places."

Rain is necessary, he said, to cleanse the earth, for plants, for animals, for people. "It is always a good day for a walk," he said.






Eva Pearlman-Nov. 22, 2010 Copyright © 2010 Patch. All Rights Reserved.

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

NCAI ENDORSES UN DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES

NCAI endorses UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
Coulter urges action at Organization of American States




WASHINGTON – The National Congress of American Indians has passed a resolution supporting the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and urging its endorsement by state governments and Congress.

The resolution was adopted unanimously by NCAI’s Subcommittee of Human, Religious and Cultural Concerns, presented to the Litigation and Governance Committee, and finally adopted unanimously by the general assembly without discussion during NCAI’s 65th annual conference in Phoenix Oct. 19 – 24.

The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples was adopted by the UN General Assembly on Sept. 13, 2007, in a historic vote by an overwhelming majority – 143 member states voted in favor, 11 abstained and four – Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States – voted against the declaration. Each of the four countries that opposed the declaration have large indigenous populations who own or have claims to huge land masses.

While it is not binding in law, the declaration represents the highest moral standard for the treatment of the world’s estimated 370 million indigenous peoples, written as it is in a human rights framework that will guide government policies for indigenous communities and promote the participation of indigenous peoples in the political processes and decisions that affect them.

The NCAI resolution recognizes that the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples “reinforces the respect and protection of full self-determination rights by and on behalf of U.S. Tribal Nations as well as the protection of tribal lands and treaties as a matter of international law and policy and is therefore in the vital interests of all U.S. Tribal Nations.”

The resolution acknowledges that the declaration expresses both the individual and collective rights of indigenous peoples, as well as their rights regarding culture, identity, language, employment, health, educational and other issues.

The UN Declaration lays out the minimum human rights necessary for the “survival, dignity and well-being of the Indigenous peoples of the world.” These include the right of self-determination, protections from discrimination and genocide, and recognition of rights to lands, territories and resources that are essential to the identity, health and livelihood of indigenous peoples. The declaration also explicitly requires that these rights and protections are balanced with other rights and interpreted in accordance with the principles of democracy, justice, non-discrimination, good governance and respect for the human rights of everyone.

The NCAI resolution reiterates the declaration’s provisions that “discrimination against indigenous people should be abolished and that promotion of their full and effective participation in all matters that concern them should be encouraged.”

The resolution asserts that indigenous peoples’ “right to remain distinct and to pursue their own visions of economic and social development is vital according to this declaration.”

The NCAI document promises to send its resolution “to all state Governors and legislators for support through their legislature for memorial resolutions to the Congress of the United States; and. ... the NCAI calls upon the United States to sign the declaration.”

Robert Tim Coulter, one of the original authors of the declaration and executive director of the Indian Law Resource Center in Helena, Mont., and Washington, D.C., says the declaration is “the most significant development in international human rights in decades. Tribes must work harder than ever to pressure the U.S. to respect these rights.”

Coulter said the best way to gain support is to demand that the United States join in adopting a strong Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in the Organization of American States. The OAS is currently negotiating a powerful American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples much like the U.N. declaration.

The OAS is the principal forum for strengthening democracy and human rights in the Western Hemisphere and is made up of 35 member nations in North, Central and South America.

“We must publicly protest the continuing violation of our rights in the United States, and we must demand serious action in the OAS to finalize an effective declaration supported by all countries in the Americas,” he said.

Coulter urged tribes to get involved at upcoming OAS meetings in Washington, D.C. on Jan. 26 – 30 and March 23 – 27, and tribal leaders to make plans now to attend “to ensure our voices are heard.”

More information is available at the OAS Web site http://www.oas.org/.

“We have to continue fighting to change discriminatory and grossly unjust laws that are applied to Native peoples.” Coulter said.

While the U.S. government has made no move toward endorsing the declaration in the 14 months since its passage, both Canada and Australia have inched forward.

Canada’s House of Commons endorsed the declaration on April 8, and called on the Senate and Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s administration to “fully implement the standards contained therein.”

Harper declined to do so, claiming that the declaration is not applicable in Canada.

Ironically, two months later Harper tacitly admitted just how applicable the Declaration’s human rights protections are in Canada. On June 11, Harper issued the first formal apology from a Canadian prime minister for the brutal Indian residential schools that were federally financed from the 1870s until the last residential school was closed in 1998.

“The treatment of children in Indian residential schools is a sad chapter in our history,” Harper said. “Today, we recognize that this policy of assimilation was wrong, has caused great harm, and has no place in our country. The government now recognizes that the consequences of the Indian residential schools policy were profoundly negative and that this policy has had a lasting and damaging impact on aboriginal culture, heritage and language.”

Australia’s new Prime Minister Kevin Rudd who defeated former Prime Minister John Howard last December, has demonstrated his intention to improve relations with the country’s indigenous peoples. The government issued a “National Apology to the Stolen Generations” in February and a commitment to “Close the Gap” in indigenous health inequality in March.

According to Peter Seidel, a partner in Public Interest Law, in an article published in The Guardian (Australia) Oct. 15, the government is close to endorsing the Declaration.

“Australia’s long held opposition to the Declaration now looks set to change, with the Commonwealth expected shortly to formalize its support. When it’s taken, the step of formally, albeit belatedly, supporting the Declaration will be very powerful symbolism for Australia. And it will of course strengthen, not diminish, our reputation within the international community as a country at the vanguard of promoting and protecting the basic human rights of all, particularly the most disenfranchised,” Seidel wrote.

Indian Country Today- Nov. 17, 2010

Monday, November 8, 2010

CALLING ALL NATIVE SPIRIT WARRIORS, ADVOCATES AND ACTIVISTS! STOP THE DESTRUCTION OF GLEN COVE SACRED SITE IN VALLJEO CA. ON NOV. 11, 2010

VALLEJO, CA.- THIS IS A ADVISORY ALERT TO ALL NATIVE SPIRIT WARRIORS, ADVOCATES AND ACTIVISTS TO REPORT TO DUTY ON NOVEMBER, 11TH, 2010 AT GLEN COVE SACRED SITE SHELL MOUND IN VALLEJO CA.!!!


There is a high potential that the City of Vallejo CA. government may have have trucks and other heavy equipment to destroy the 4000 year old Shell Mound, where thousands upon thousands of the Ancestors sleep.

The park and recreation division of the City of Vallejo, the Greater Vallejo Recreation District (GVRD) has plans to go ahead to destroy one of the last remaining prehistoric partial intact bay shore Shell mounds of California Native America!!

A call is being placed to all Spirit Warriors, Advocates and Activists to assemble at Glen Cove at 8 am on November 11th, 2010 to prevent trucks, bulldozers and other heavy equipment from eco-raping the sacred Shell Mound site!!

Brothers and Sisters, the time for talk is over! No compromise in the DEFENSE OF THE ANCESTORS!!


FOR INFO:

707/ 557-2140

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

GLEN COVE SACRED SITE UNDER ATTACK, VALLEJO COPS ARE CALLED TO HARASS NATIVE ADVOCATES

Vallejo, Ca.- On Tuesday, November 2, 2010 the Greater Vallejo Recreational Park District (G.V.R.D): the Park and Recreation division of the City of Vallejo CA. attempted to bring a fleet of large drilling trucks to attempt to take core samples from the 4,000 year old Shell Mound where thousands of Native ancestors are buried.

A handful of Native Advocates were able to stop the drilling for the time at the Sacred site, then the G.V.R.D called the Vallejo Police Department to have them arrested.

However the V.P.D. backed off and backed down! There were no arrests! The drilling did not happen!

There is a call to Native community to come out to Glen Cove, on November 11, 2010 to stop the eco-rape of the Shell Mound Sacred site.


For more information:

707/ 557-2140
505/ 603-2908
510/ 478-4569

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

ALERT!!! THE ANCESTORS ARE CALLING!! PLEASE RESPOND TO SPIRITUAL CEREMONY AT GLEN COVE SACRED SITE IN VALLEJO,CA






'THE ANCESTORS ARE CRYING' SPIRITUAL CEREMONY AT GLEN COVE SHELLMOUND SACRED SITE IN VALLEJO, CA


VALLEJO,CA- There will be a large spiritual gathering of several thousand people at the Glen Cove Shellmound sacred site on Saturday, October 16,2010 at 12 noon.

The City of Vallejo CA, park and recreation division- the Greater Vallejo Recreation District and their developers- Alta Planning/Design are planning to start the physical eco-rape and destruction of ancient 5000 year shell mound in less than 10 days of this writing!!

We all asking all advocates, activists, elders,spiritual leaders, families and the greater Native community to join us in this Spiritual ceremony. We are are organizing for well over 2000
people to attend!

Please come join us on the REAL FRONT LINES FOR MORE HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS FOR INDIAN COUNTRY!!

'THE ANCESTORS ARE CRYING ', BRING YOUR PRAYERS, YOUR MEDICINE, YOUR SONGS to stop the eco-rape and destruction of the shell mound where the Ancient Ones Sleep!


GLEN COVE IN VALLEJO, CA AT 12 NOON, OCTOBER, 16, 2010

For more information:

707/ 557-2140
505/ 603-2908

Thursday, September 2, 2010

JUDGE STRIKES DOWNS CHALLENGE TO VOTER PAMPHLET ARGUEMENT AGAINST GUIDIVILLE BAND OF POMO HOTEL CASINO RESORT

Judge strikes down challenge to voter-pamphlet argument against Richmond casino




MARTINEZ -- A Contra Costa Superior Court judge on Monday upheld language in a ballot argument against a proposed Las Vegas-style hotel-casino resort on Richmond's waterfront, the day before the voters pamphlet reaches the printers.

The legal wrangling over wording underscored how carefully supporters and opponents are crafting their message to voters on Measure U, the advisory measure on whether a casino should be built.

Richmond resident Don Gosney argued that opponents incorrectly state in their ballot argument that there is no guarantee locals would be hired and that casino jobs would be low-wage. Gosney filed a petition in court last week seeking to delete the two statements.

Opponents have "no right in the public forum to make false statements," said Michael Sweet, Gosney's attorney.

But opponents maintain that the statements are true and that the public should hear them.

"They're trying to argue this is a done deal, and it is not," said Peter Sturges, who represents an opponent.

The promise of jobs has become a major issue in the debate over the casino-hotel resort that Upstream and the Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians want to build at the old Point Molate Naval Fuel Depot.

The project's draft environmental report estimates 17,000 operational jobs. Under a current agreement, Guidiville would hire Richmond residents for 40 percent of nonmanagement casino and hotel jobs. Developer Jim Levine of Upstream has pegged that pool at 3,000 workers, meaning at least 1,200 spots would be set aside for Richmond residents. Levine has said the casino intends to go beyond that and include 1,500 on-site workers in retail, entertainment and other services.

Supporters have embraced these figures, but critics say the numbers are inflated and jobs for locals are not certain.

Named as parties of interest in Gosney's petition were the people who penned the opponents' ballot argument: Joan Garrett, Andres Soto, Kenneth Davis, Mayor Gayle McLaughlin and Vice Mayor Jeff Ritterman.

On Monday, Judge Barry Baskin twice sent the parties out of the courtroom to talk among themselves and come up with language everyone could agree on. The attorneys spent more than an hour attempting a compromise, each drafting wording and walking back and forth down the hallway to deliver sheets of paper carrying different proposals. They also met in a conference room but could not reach an agreement.

So they returned to the courtroom to argue their case. Sweet pointed to provisions in the land disposition and municipal services agreements between the city and developer that call for local hiring and a living wage, which would be $16.69 an hour without benefits and $15.19 an hour with benefits.

But Sturges, who represents Soto, said the agreements carry "loopholes galore." He read aloud provisions that give the developer some leeway with its work force. In addition, the contracts are not final, state and federal approvals are still needed, and legal challenges threaten to railroad the promise of jobs altogether.

Baskin ruled to deny Gosney's petition, meaning there will be no changes to the arguments for or against Measure U in the voters pamphlet.

"Both sides have overstated what the facts in the case are," Baskin said. While the opponents' argument oversimplifies, he said, "I don't think it rises to the level of being false or misleading."

Contra Costa Times- August 30,2010

Monday, August 30, 2010

CALIFORINIA SACRED SITE GETS RESPITE

Sacred Site Gets Respite


PALA, Calif. – A site in rural San Diego County deemed culturally and environmentally sensitive by Indians was given a respite Aug. 5 from being turned into a landfill.

The Pala Band of Mission Indians, whose community sits two miles away from the site, and an environmental group, objected to the application to operate the proposed 1,770-acre landfill filed from Gregory Canyon Landfill Ltd of San Diego, the tribe said in a press release.

A San Diego County public agency rescinded its previous green light on the application after the tribe and the Natural Resources Defense Council pointed out the lack of financial responsibility and other inaccuracies in the application, the tribe said in the press release.

“We want to make sure that this time the county is really looking at a comprehensive application package that accurately reflects the environmental, financial and cultural impacts that this landfill will have,” said Robert Smith, chairman of the Pala Band of Mission Indians. “The county has a duty to make sure new landfills do not destroy important cultural or environmental resources or threaten public health, and it can’t do that unless it has accurate information.”

Gregory Landfill spokesperson Nancy Chase said the application was not rejected by San Diego County officials but voluntarily withdrawn from county consideration because it needed to be updated.

“It had nothing to do with financial responsibility.”

County records indicate that its positive determination on the application was rescinded and Gregory Landfill withdrew the application on the same day.

The landfill has been a subject of dispute since at least the 1990s and the subject of court actions, including an order by a superior court to make corrections on a mandated environmental impact report and conform to the law in 2006, according to county records.

Gregory Canyon has until Feb. 1, 2011 to resubmit the application, according to the county. The applicant expects to resubmit their application later this month Chase said.

The proposed landfill is located in an area that Pala people consider sacred and home of a restless spirit named Taakwic, who appears in a ball of fire to collect the souls of the dead. The landfill threatens surface and groundwater supplies, which includes a habitat for several sensitive and endangered species and would create traffic congestion and other problems in the serene area if constructed, according to the tribe.

Gregory Landfill maintains that the project’s technology includes redundant liners and monitoring points and pose no threat to water sources.

Indian Country Today-August 30, 2010