Thursday, July 15, 2010

THE CITY GOVERNMENT OF RICHMOND, CA. DISPLAYS SEEDS OF RACISM TO GUIDIVILLE BAND OF POMO




SUPPORT SELF DETERMINATION AND SOVEREIGNTY OF THE GUIDIVILLE BAND OF POMO

RICHMOND CALIFORNIA- Members of the Richmond City Council are displaying seeds of both racism and prejudice to the Guidiville Band of Pomo with regards to their self-determination to open a Hotel Casino resort on the Guideville Band of Pomo reservation at Pt. Molate in Richmond, CA.

Mayor Gayle McLaughlin and fellow Council members Jeff Ritterman and Thomas Butt wish to place a so-called advisory measure on whether a casino should be part of development plans for the Guidiville Band of Pomo Hotel Casino Resort at Pt. Molate. If approved it by the Richmond City Council, it would become a ballot measure for the voters of Richmond on November 2,2011.

The City Government is in clear volation of sticking it's nose into the internal affairs of the Guidiville Band of Pomo with regards to its policies of self- determination, self-autonomy and soverneignity under Federal treaty laws.

In November, 2010, the Mayors Office supported the United Nations Declaration on the Indigenous People.

Under articles 3 it states: " Indigenous people have the right to self-determination. By virtue
of the right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development."

Under artlicle 26 it states: " Indigenous people have the right to own, use, develop and control the lands, territories and resources they posses by reason of traditional ownership or other traditional occupation or use, as well of those which they HAVE ACQUIRED."

TEACHING THE VALUES OF PEACE deems this as racist action and conduct against the advancement of Native Peoples ,and a clear violation of their national and international Human and Civil Rights.



Richmond may give voters say on Point Molate casino



An advisory measure on whether a casino should be part of development plans on Richmond's waterfront could go before voters Nov. 2.

The City Council is scheduled to consider Tuesday night whether to place a measure on the ballot. It would be advisory only, meaning the city would not be legally bound by it.
Supporters and opponents have floated polls that seem to suggest public opinion is almost evenly divided, Councilman Tom Butt said.

"When something is that close, it's good for the City Council to know where the Richmond electorate is on this before they make a decision," said Butt, who is proposing Tuesday's agenda item.
Upstream Investments and the Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians want to build a $1.2 billion casino-hotel resort with as many as 4,000 slot machines, 1,100 hotel rooms, a conference center, restaurants, shops, tribal headquarters, open space and a shoreline trail.

The city extended its land development agreement with Upstream to April 2011 to allow continued negotiations. Meanwhile Guidiville is seeking approval from the Secretary of the Interior to place the land in trust and needs a state gaming compact, both required to open the casino.
Jim Levine of Upstream and Guidiville spokesman Michael Derry could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

A public vote appears to have support from a council majority. Butt's agenda item is co-sponsored by Mayor Gayle McLaughlin and Vice Mayor Jeff
Ritterman.

Councilwoman Maria Viramontes has also proposed a public vote. She could not be reached for comment Wednesday, but wrote in a letter earlier this month: "The consideration of expanding urban gaming into the Richmond community has created controversy and legitimate concern within and around the Richmond community. ... It would seem appropriate for an alternative as significant as 'urban gaming' that the Richmond City Council should place an advisory measure before the people of Richmond to obtain their serious reflection on the matter."

City leaders said they have the right to consider alternatives to a project with a casino. A 2006 settlement agreement among the city, developers and Citizens for the East Shore Parks over the Point Molate land development agreement gave the city discretion to choose an alternative project.

Last year, Butt sought clarity from the Attorney General's Office, which helped negotiate the settlement, and received a letter that reads in part: "any interpretations of the 2004 LDA that would restrict the city's ability to consider alternative uses of the site, or alternatives that would not involve lease or transfer to Upstream, ... must be rejected."

The Richmond City Council is scheduled to consider placing an advisory measure on the Nov. 2 ballot on whether a casino should be part of Point Molate's future. The council meets at 6:30 p.m. Tuesday at the Community Services Building, 440 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond.


Contra Costa Times-July 15, 2010